The The implementation of the Regulatory Framework for Civil Society Organizations: dynamics between theinstitutional logics of the State and society and their implication in co-production
dinámica organizativa Estado-sociedad y coproducción
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21118/apgs.v14i3.13495Abstract
Research objective: to understand how the processes of co-production in the Regulatory Framework for Civil SocietyOrganizations (MROSC) implementation is influenced by the State-society organizational dynamics, given by the interactionbetween different institutional logics.
Theoretical framework: the research theoretical referencies are the literatures on institutional logics and co-production of goods,services and public policies.Methodology: collective instrumental case study of the Councils of Fostering and Collaboration (CONFOCOs) of BeloHorizonte and Bahia, based on semi-structured interviews, direct observation and document analysis, operationalized throughcontent analysis.
Results: certain sets of processes in the implementation of the MROSC within CONFOCOs are coproduced in the two casesstudied, but they are distinct in each case. ?ere is a strong presence of state and community institutional logics in the field, andthe different ways in which they relate produce distinct coproduced results.Originality: application of neoinstitutional theory in a study on co-production to explain the variations of the results co-producedin a given process.Theoretical and practical contributions: State-society organizational dynamics can be explained, among other factors, by theinteractions between institutional logics. These interactions, when established in the scope of the CONFOCOs, influence theresults that are co-produced in them.
Results: certain sets of processes in the implementation of the MROSC within CONFOCOs are coproduced in the two casesstudied, but they are distinct in each case. ?ere is a strong presence of state and community institutional logics in the field, andthe different ways in which they relate produce distinct coproduced results.Originality: application of neoinstitutional theory in a study on co-production to explain the variations of the results co-producedin a given process. Theoretical and practical contributions: State-society organizational dynamics can be explained, among other factors, by theinteractions between institutional logics. ?ese interactions, when established in the scope of the CONFOCOs, influence theresults that are co-produced in them.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/3.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.
Authors who publish in the Journal of Public Administration and Management Social (APGS) must agree to the following terms:
• Authors retain copyright and give the journal the rightof first publication with the work simultaneously licensed underthe Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting sharingwork with the recognition of the work of authorship and publicationstarting in this journal.
• Authors have authorization to assume additional contractsseparately for non-exclusive distribution of the work releasepublished in this journal (eg. publish in institutional repositories oras a book), with an acknowledgment of its publicationstarting this journal.
• Authors are permitted and encouraged to post theirwork online (eg, in institutional repositories or on their websitepersonnel) at any point before or during the submission process, asit can generate criticism and helpful suggestions, as well asincrease the impact and citation of published work.
• Authors reserve the right of the editors of this journal to make in theoriginal works, alterations of normative order, orthographic andgrammatical, aiming at complying with its editorial policy and keep thedefault cult of language, respecting, however, the authors' style.
• Authors assume exclusive responsibility for their opinionsgiven in the articles published in this journal.