Identifying Barriers to the adoption of the Brazilian Digital Governance Policy and the Role of Collaborative Governance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21118/apgs.v16i4.15402Abstract
This article aims to identify strategies and barriers to the adoption of Digital Governance by the Brazilian Public Administration based on the Digital Governance Policy, which focuses on access to information, service provision, and social participation. Qualitative exploratory research was conducted through policy analysis and semi-structured interviews carried out with 11 ICT managers from public organizations. Barriers to each Digital Governance strategy were identified, and, based on the literature, they were classified into structural or cultural, individual, organizational, or strategic barriers. Findings show an association between these barriers and Collaborative Governance, which can foster the Digital Governance strategy or hinder it, in case it lacks or is not well implemented. Include something more from the discussion.
Downloads
References
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of public administration research and theory, 18(4), 543-571.
Bannister, & Connolly. (2012). Defining e-governance. E-Service Journal, 8(2), 3. https://doi.org/10.2979/eservicej.8.2.3
Bardin, L. (2010). Análise de conteúdo [Content analysis](LA Reto & A. Pinheiro, Trans.). Lisboa, Portugal: Edições, 70.
Barnes, M., Newman, J., & Sullivan, H. (2004). Power, participation, and political renewal: theoretical perspectives on public participation under new labour in Britain. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 11(2), 267-279.
Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2010). Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: e-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government Information Quarterly, 27(3), 264–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.03.001
Cepik, M., & Canabarro, D. R. (2010). Governança de TI. (W. Editor, Ed.). Porto Alegre.
Chadwick, A. (2003). Bringing e-democracy back in. Social Science Computer Review, 21(4), 443–455. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439303256372
Dawes, S. S. (2008). The evolution and continuing challenges of e-governance. Public Administration Review, 68(SUPPL. 1), 86–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00981.x
Dawes, S. S. (2009). Governance in the digital age: a research and action framework for an uncertain future. Government Information Quarterly, 26(2), 257–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2008.12.003
Decreto nº 8.638 de 15 de janeiro de 2016. Institui a Política de Governança Digital no âmbito dos órgãos e das entidades da administração pública federal direta, autárquica e fundacional, Diário Oficial da União (2016). https://doi.org/ISSN 1677-7042
Federici, T., Braccini, A. M., & Sæbø, Ø. (2015). ‘Gentlemen, all aboard!’ ICT and party politics: reflections from a mass-eparticipation experience. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 287–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.04.009
Greenberg, S., & Newell, A. (2012). Transparency issues in e-governance and civic engagement. In Active Citizen Participation in E-Government (pp. 44–64). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-0116-1.ch003
Guimarães, T. D. A., & Medeiros, P. H. R. (2005). A relação entre governo eletrônico e governança eletrônica no governo federal brasileiro. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, 3(4), 01–18. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-39512005000400004
Heckert, C. R., & Aguiar, E. L. de. (2016). Governança digital na administração pública federal: uma abordagem estratégica para tornar o governo digital mais efetivo e colaborativo - a ótica da sociedade. In Congresso de Gestão Pública - Consad (p. 18). Brasilia.
Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., & Zuiderwijk, A. (2012). Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. Information Systems Management, 29(4), 258–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2012.716740
Kalsi, N. S., & Kiran, R. (2015). A strategic framework for good governance through e-governance optimization. Program, 49(2), 170–204. https://doi.org/10.1108/PROG-12-2013-0067
Luciano, E. M., Wiedenhoft, G. C., & Santos, F. P. dos. (2016). Understanding the IT governance adoption expectations in public organizations. In XL EnANPAD (pp. 0–14).
Magnette, P. (2003). European governance and civic participation: beyond elitist citizenship? Political studies, 51(1), 144-160.
Meijer, A. (2015). E-governance innovation: barriers and strategies. Government Information Quarterly, 32(2), 198–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.01.001
Melitski, J., Carrizales, T. J., Manoharan, A., & Holzer, M. (2011). Digital governance success factors and barriers to success in Prague. International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior, 14(4), 451–472. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Milakovich, M. E. (2012). Digital governance: new technologies for improving public service and participation. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203815991
Nawafleh, S., Obiedat, R., & Harfoushi, O. (2012). E-government between developed and developing countries. International Journal of Advanced Corporate Learning (iJAC), 5(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijac.v5i1.1887
Panagiotopoulos, P., Moody, C., & Elliman, T. (2012). Institutional diffusion of eparticipation in the english local government: is central policy the way forward? Information Systems Management, 29(4), 295–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2012.716991
Sampaio, R. (2009). Governança eletrônica no Brasil: limites e possibilidades introduzidos pelo orçamento participativo na internet. Planejamento e Políticas Públicas - PPP, 33(jul/dez), 124–143. Retrieved from http://www.academia.edu/865460/Governanca_eletronica_no_Brasil_limites_e_possibilidades_introduzidos_pelo_Orcamento_Participativo_na_Internet
Sampieri, R. H., Collado, C. F., & Lucio, M. D. P. B. Metodologia de pesquisa. 3. ed. São Paulo: McGraw-Hill, 2006.
Savoldelli, A., Codagnone, C., & Misuraca, G. (2014). Understanding the e-government paradox: learning from literature and practice on barriers to adoption. Government Information Quarterly, 31(SUPPL.1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.01.008
Saxena, K. B. C. (2005). Towards excellence in e-governance. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 18(6), 498–513. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513550510616733
Scholl, H. J., Kubicek, H., Cimander, R., & Klischewski, R. (2012). Process integration, information sharing, and system interoperation in government: a comparative case analysis. Government Information Quarterly, 29(3), 313–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.02.009
Tassabehji, R., Hackney, R., & Popovi?, A. (2016). Emergent digital era governance: enacting the role of the ‘institutional entrepreneur’ in transformational change. Government Information Quarterly, 33(2), 223–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.04.003
Twinomurinzi, H., Phahlamohlaka, J., & Byrne, E. (2012). The small group subtlety of using ICT for participatory governance: a South African experience. Government Information Quarterly, 29(2), 203–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2011.09.010
Vaz, J. C. (2017). Transformações tecnológicas e perspectivas para a gestão democrática das políticas culturais. Cadernos de Gestão Pública E Cidadania (B1), 22(71), 85–104. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.12660/cgpc.v22n71.63284
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.
Authors who publish in the Journal of Public Administration and Management Social (APGS) must agree to the following terms:
• Authors retain copyright and give the journal the rightof first publication with the work simultaneously licensed underthe Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting sharingwork with the recognition of the work of authorship and publicationstarting in this journal.
• Authors have authorization to assume additional contractsseparately for non-exclusive distribution of the work releasepublished in this journal (eg. publish in institutional repositories oras a book), with an acknowledgment of its publicationstarting this journal.
• Authors are permitted and encouraged to post theirwork online (eg, in institutional repositories or on their websitepersonnel) at any point before or during the submission process, asit can generate criticism and helpful suggestions, as well asincrease the impact and citation of published work.
• Authors reserve the right of the editors of this journal to make in theoriginal works, alterations of normative order, orthographic andgrammatical, aiming at complying with its editorial policy and keep thedefault cult of language, respecting, however, the authors' style.
• Authors assume exclusive responsibility for their opinionsgiven in the articles published in this journal.