Banking Training for Teaching Competition and the Principles of Public Administration
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21118/apgs.v15i3.14409Abstract
Research objective: The research aims to analyze the formation of the examination board for teachers of a Federal Public Institution of Education and to identify possible weaknesses in the composition system in order to propose improvements in the light of the constitutional principles of legality, impersonality, morality, publicity and efficiency, considering university autonomy.
Theoretical framework: Over the years, public administration has gone through 3 management models: patrimonial, bureaucratic and managerial. Within this context, administrative practices were covered with concepts and criteria that supported the models. Starting from this premise, building a brief evolution, we arrive at public tenders and the constitutional principles that must be observed in every context of Public Administration.
Methodology: Data collection was carried out through a questionnaire applied via googleforms and the analysis was performed using the Atlas TI software, which allowed the formation of networks, which identified the perception of candidates and professors regarding the form currently adopted in the formation of boards.
Results: Data analysis signaled a possible deficiency in the practices adopted for bank formation, which may trigger offense to constitutional principles and patrimonial practices.
Originality: The research expands the literature on public contests for professors at IFES in Brazil and the consecration of the principles of public administration in this type of contest, allowing the identification of offenses to the principles in the elements of formation of the boards.
Theoretical and practical contributions: The results make it possible to compare the criteria of formation of the bench for teaching contests with the principles of public administration, identifying which practices adopted can be considered offensive to such principles. In this context, once the points of offense have been identified, managers can reformulate the practices adopted, in order to standardize and improve the selection processes.
Keywords:Public tender, Principles of public administration, Banking formation, University autonomy.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.
Authors who publish in the Journal of Public Administration and Management Social (APGS) must agree to the following terms:
• Authors retain copyright and give the journal the rightof first publication with the work simultaneously licensed underthe Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting sharingwork with the recognition of the work of authorship and publicationstarting in this journal.
• Authors have authorization to assume additional contractsseparately for non-exclusive distribution of the work releasepublished in this journal (eg. publish in institutional repositories oras a book), with an acknowledgment of its publicationstarting this journal.
• Authors are permitted and encouraged to post theirwork online (eg, in institutional repositories or on their websitepersonnel) at any point before or during the submission process, asit can generate criticism and helpful suggestions, as well asincrease the impact and citation of published work.
• Authors reserve the right of the editors of this journal to make in theoriginal works, alterations of normative order, orthographic andgrammatical, aiming at complying with its editorial policy and keep thedefault cult of language, respecting, however, the authors' style.
• Authors assume exclusive responsibility for their opinionsgiven in the articles published in this journal.
