Effect of reduced age at first calving and an increased weaning rate on CO2 equivalent emissions in a cow-calf system
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13083/reveng.v30i1.14028Keywords:
Sustainability, productivity, livestockAbstract
The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of using technology to reduce the age at first calving (AFC; from 48 to 24 months) and increase the weaning rate (WR; from 60% to 80%) in beef herds. The need for pasture area (hectares) and the CO2 equivalent emissions (CO2eq.) of animals present in the production system were analyzed. Data from a livestock breeding system were used to produce 400 male calves per year: System 1) using reproductive biotechnology (fixed-time artificial insemination [FTAI] and System 2) without the use of reproductive biotechnology (only natural mating). System 1, which used reproductive biotechnology (FTAI; composed of 1,540 AU of animals in 1,540 hectares), presented a lower AFC (24 months), a higher WR (80%), and lower CO2eq. emissions per year (2,311.3 tons). System 2, which did not employ reproductive technology (composed of 2,475 AU [450 kg of animals] on 2,475 hectares), had the highest AFC (48 months) and lowest WR (60%) and emitted 3,714.5 tons of CO2eq. per year. The reduction in CO2eq. emissions per year was 1,403.3 tons in the system that used reproductive biotechnology, corresponding to gains of US$ 135,920.42 (US$ 96.86 per ton of CO2eq.). It is estimated that the adoption of the FTAI increases the reproductive efficiency of a cow-calf operation system, which can produce the same number of male calves (400) on 935 fewer hectares of pasture (-37.3%) and with a reduction of 1,403.3 tons of CO2eq. produced per year.
Downloads
References
Associação Brasileira das Indústrias Exportadoras de Carnes (ABIEC). Sumário 2021. Available at: http://abiec.com.br/publicacoes/beef-report-2021/.pdf. Accessed: 1 Aug. 2021.
Baruselli, P.S. IATF gera ganhos que superam R$ 3,5 bilhões nas cadeias de produção de carne e de leite. Boletim Eletrônico do Departamento de Reprodução Animal – FMVZ/USP, 2ª Edição, 2019. Available at: http://vra.fmvz.usp.br/boletim-eletronico-vra/. Accessed: 21 Mar. 2019.
Baruselli P.S.; Ferreira R.M.; Colli M.H.A.; Elliff F.M.; Sá Filho M.F.; Vieira L.M.; Freitas B.G. Timed artificial insemination: current challenges and recent advances in reproductive efficiency in beef and dairy herds in Brazil. Animal Reproduction Science, v. 14, n. 3, p. 558-571, 2017.
Baruselli, P.S.; Ferreira, R.M.; Sá Filho, M.F.; Bó, G.A. Review: Using artificial insemination v. natural service in beef herds. Animal Reproduction Science, v. 12, p. 45-52, 2018.
Baruselli, P.S.; Abreu, L.A.; Catussi, B.L.C.; Santos, G.F.F.; Factor, L.; Felisbino, A.R.; Frigoni, F.G.; Crepaldi, G.A. Mitos e realidades sobre a inseminação artificial em tempo fixo (IATF) em bovinos de corte. Anais do XXIV Congresso Brasileiro de Reprodução Animal (CBRA-2021) e VIII International Symposium on Animal Biology of Reproduction. Joint Meeting, 2021.
Beauchemin, K.A.; Janzen, H.H.; Little, S.M.; McAllister, T.A.; McGinn, S.M. Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from beef production system in western Canada; evaluation using farm-based life cycle assessment. Animal Feed Science and Technology, v. 166, p. 663-677, 2011.
Becoña, G.; Astigarraga, L.; Picasso, V.D. Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Beef Cow-Calf Grazing Systems in Uruguay. Sustainable Agriculture Research, v. 3, n. 2, p. 89-105, 2014.
Bellarby, J.; Tirado, R.; Leip, A.; Weiss, F.; Lesschen, J.P.; Smith, P. Livestock greenhouse gas emissions and mitigation potential in Europe. Global Change Biology, v. 19, p. 3-18, 2013.
Beretta, V. Produtividade e eficiência biológica de sistemas pecuários criadores diferindo na idade das novilhas ao primeiro parto e na taxa de natalidade do rebanho de cria no Rio Grande de Sul. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, v. 30, p. 1278-1288, 2001.
Beretta, V. Produtividade e eficiência biológica de sistemas de recria e engorda de gado de corte no Rio Grande do Sul. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, v. 31, p. 696-706, 2002.
Braga, R.P. Os modelos de simulação e a investigação de sistemas da agricultura. Ordem Eng., v. 20, p. 48-54, 1997.
Bó, G.A.; Cutaia, L.; Peres, L.C.; Pincinato, D.; Marosa, D.; Baruselli, P.S. Technologies for fixed-time artificial insemination and their influence on reproductive performance of Bos indicus cattle. Society of Reproduction and Fertility, supplement 64, p. 223-236, 2007.
Buddle, B.M.; Denis, M.; Attwood, G.T.; Altermann, E.; Janssen, P.H.; Ronimus, R.S.; Pinares-Patino, C.S.; Muetzel, S.; Wedlock, D. Strategies to reduce methane emissions from farmed ruminants grazing on pasture. The Veterinary Journal, v. 188, p. 11-17, 2011.
Cullen, B.R.; Eckard, R.J.; Timms, M.; Phelps, D. G. The effect of earlier mating and improving fertility on greenhouse gas emissions intensity of beef production in northern Australian herds. The Rangeland Journal, v. 38, n. 3, p. 283-290, 2016.
Eckard, R.J.; Grainger, C.; De Klein, C.A.M. Options for the abatement of methane and nitrous oxide from ruminant production: A review. Livestock Science, v. 130, p. 47-56, 2010.
European Commission, EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS), available at: https://ec.europa.eu/clima/eu-action/eu-emissions-trading-system-eu-ets_en#ecl-inpage-689. Acessed: 24 Jan. 2022.
Fialho, F.B. Sistemas de apoio à decisão na produção de suínos e aves. In: Reunião Anual da Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia, 36., 1999, Porto Alegre. Anais...Porto Alegre: SBZ, p. 307-317, 1999.
Figueiredo, E.B.; Jayasundara, S.; Bordonal, R.O.; Berchielli, T.T.; Reis, R.A.; Wagner-Riddle, C.; Scala Jr, N. Greenhouse gas balance and carbon footprint of beef cattle in three contrasting pasture-management systems in Brazil. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 142, p. 420-431, 2017.
Forster, P.; Ramaswamy, V.; Artaxo, P.; Berntsen, T.; Betts, R.; Fahey, D.W.; Haywood, J.; Lean, J.; Lowe, D.C.; Myhre, G.; Nganga, J.; Prinn, R.; Raga, G.; Schulz, M.; Van Dorland, R. Changes in atmospheric constituents and in radiative forcing. In: Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Solomon, S., D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M. Tignor and H.L. Miller (eds.)]. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
Gerber, P.J.; Hristov, A.N.; Henderson, B.; Makkar, H.; Oh, J.; Lee, C.; Meinen, R.; Montes, F.; Ott, T.; Firkins, J.; Rotz, A.; Dell, C.; Adesogan, A. T.; Yang, W.Z.; Tricarico, J.M.; Kebreab, E.; Waghorn, G.; Dijkstra, J.; Oosting, S. Technical options for the mitigation of direct methane and nitrous oxide emissions from livestock: a review. Animal, v. 7, p. 220-234, 2013.
Gill, M.; Smith, P.; Wilkinson, J.M. Mitigating climate change: the role of domestic livestock. Animal, v. 4, p. 323-333, 2010.
Hristov, A.N.; Ott, T.; Tricarico, J.; Rotz, A.; Waghorn, G.; Adesogan, A.; Dijkstra, J.; Montes, F.R.; Oh, J.; Kebreab, E.; Oosting, S.J.; Gerber, P.J.; Henderson, B.; Makkar, H.P.; Firkins, J.L. Mitigation of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from animal operations: III. A review of animal management mitigation options. Journal of Animal Science, v. 91, p. 5095-5113, 2013.
Llonch, P.; Haskell, M.J.; Dewhurst, R.J.; Turner, S.P. Review: current available strategies to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions in livestock systems: an animal welfare perspective. Animal, v. 11, e. 2, p. 1-11, 2016.
Malafaia, G.C.; Mores, G.V.; Casagranda, Y.G.; Barcellos, J.O.J.; Costa, F.P. The Brazilian beef cattle supply chain in the next decades. Livestock Science, v. 253, 2021.
Nguyen, T.T.H.; Doreau, M.; Corson, M.S.; Eugène, M.; Delaby, L.; Chesneau, G.; Gallard, Y.; Van der Werf, H.M.G. Effect of dairy production system, breed and co-product handling methods on environmental impacts at farm level. Journal of Environmental Management, v. 120, p. 127-137, 2013.
Oaigen, R.P; Barcellos, J.O.J.; Christofari, L.F.; Braccini Neto, J.; Oliveira, T.E; Prates, E.R. Melhoria organizacional na produção de bezerros de corte a partir dos centros de custos. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, v. 37, n. 3, p. 580-587, 2008.
Pegden, C.D.; Shannon, R.F.; Sadowsky, R.P. Introduction to Simulation using SIMAN, USA: McGraw-Hill, 1995.
Quinton, C.D.; Hely, F.S.; Amer, P.R.; Byrne, T.J.; Cromie, A.R. Prediction of effects of beef selection indexes on greenhouse gas emissions. Animal, v.12, n.05, p. 889-897, 2017.
Rovira, J. Manejo nutritivo de los rodeos de cría en pastoreo. Montevideo: Editorial Hemisferio Sur, 288 p., 1996.
Silva, F.C. Modelos de simulação para análise e apoio à decisão em agrossistemas. Rev. Biociência, v.8, p.7-17, 2002.
Souza, J.L.M. Modelo para análise de risco econômico aplicado ao planejamento de projetos de irrigação para a cultura do cafeeiro. 2001. 253f. Tese (Doutorado). Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queirós, Universidade de São Paulo, Piracicaba, 2001.
Steffen, W.; Richardson, K.; Rockström, J.; Cornell, S.E.; Fetzer, I.; Bennett, E.M.; Biggs, R.; Carpenter, S.R.; de Vries, W.; de Wit, C.A.; Folke, C.; Gerten, D.; Heinke, J.; Mace, G.M.; Persson, L.M.; Ramanathan, V.; Reyers, B.; Sörlin, S. Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science, v. 1259855, n. Section 1, p. 1-8, 2015.
Valle, E.R.; Andreotti, R.; Thiago, L.R.L. de S. Estratégias para aumento da eficiência reprodutiva e produtiva em bovinos de corte. EMBRAPA–CNPGC, Campo Grande, v. 71, 80 p., 1998.
Zervas, G.; Tsiplakou, E. An assessment of GHG emissions from small ruminants in comparison with GHG emissions from large ruminants and monogastric livestock. Atmospheric Environment, v. 49, p. 13-23, 2012.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Engineering in Agriculture
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
The author(s) authorize(s) the publication of the text in the journal;
The author(s) ensure(s) that the contribution is original and unpublished and that it is not in the process of evaluation by another journal;
The journal is not responsible for the views, ideas and concepts presented in articles, and these are the sole responsibility of the author(s);
The publishers reserve the right to make textual adjustments and adapt texts to meet with publication standards.
From submission, the author is fully conceding the paper's patrimonial rights to the publication, but retaining the owner of its moral rights (authorship and paper's identification) according to Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial.