EVALUATION OF METHODS TO ESTIMATE EVAPOTRANSPIRATION AT THREE LOCATIONS OF NORTHERN MINAS GERAIS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13083/reveng.v19i5.260Keywords:
Blaney Cridlle, Hargreaves-Samani, Penman–Monteith, Priestley-Taylor, modelos empíricos, radiaçãoAbstract
The objective of this study was to compare the methods of Blaney Criddle, Hargreaves-Samani, Priestley-Taylor and Radiation with the standard method Penman-Monteith (FAO 56), to estimate evapotranspirtaion under the climatic conditions of Montes Claros, Espinosa and Salinas, located in the northern Minas Gerais. Analysis was done using 10 years (1996 to 2005) daily data regarding maximum and minimum temperatures, wind speed, sunshine and relative humidity. To compare the ETo estimated by using empirical equations with the standard method of Penman-Monteith (FAO 56) the following parameters were used: ‘a’ and ‘b’ of the regression equation, coefficient of determination (R²), correlation coefficient (r), the mean absolute error, root mean square error, the agreement index and the confidence or performance index. The methods were evaluated for two seasons, during low evaporative demand in the months of April to September, and high demand during October to March. In both seasons, the methods of Blaney and Criddle Priestley Taylor proved to be more precise. The method of Hargreaves-Samani was unsatisfactory under the weather conditions studied.Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
The author(s) authorize(s) the publication of the text in the journal;
The author(s) ensure(s) that the contribution is original and unpublished and that it is not in the process of evaluation by another journal;
The journal is not responsible for the views, ideas and concepts presented in articles, and these are the sole responsibility of the author(s);
The publishers reserve the right to make textual adjustments and adapt texts to meet with publication standards.
From submission, the author is fully conceding the paper's patrimonial rights to the publication, but retaining the owner of its moral rights (authorship and paper's identification) according to Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial.