Some realism about new negal realism: what’s new, what’s legal, what’s real?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32361/2021130111700Keywords:
Constructivism, Empiricism, Epistemology, Legal reality, RepresentationAbstract
Current endeavours to develop a ‘realistic’ concept of international law should take into account that there is not only one reality. It does not suf?ce to admit that reality can be perceived from different angles. Rather, a realistic account of modern society has to acknowledge that we can no longer speak of the ‘world’ or ‘reality’ as a singular entity. Perspectives matter; they construct their own, distinct objects of cognition. A ‘New Legal Realism’ is deliberately new, legal, and realistic only insofar as it is conceived as an understanding of how (international) law creates its own realities.
Downloads
References
ALEXANDER, Gregory. Comparing the Two Legal Realisms-American and Scandinavian. The American Journal of Comparative Law, v. 50, p. 131, 1 dez. 2003.
ASSMANN, Aleida. Im Dickicht der Zeichen. Berlin: Suhrkamp Verlag, 2015.
AUGSBERG, Ino; KORIOTH, Stefan; VESTING, Thomas (Orgs.). Grundrechte als Phänomene kollektiver Ordnung: Zur Wiedergewinnung des Gesellschaftlichen in der Grundrechtstheorie und Grundrechtsdogmatik. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2014.
AUGSBERG, Ino; LENSKI, Sophie-Charlotte (Orgs.). Die Innenwelt der Außenwelt der Innenwelt des Rechts: Annäherungen zwischen Rechts- und Literaturwissenschaft. 2012. Edition. München: Wilhelm Fink, 2012.
AUGSBERG, Ino. Informationsverwaltungsrecht: Zur kognitiven Dimension der rechtlichen Steuerung von Verwaltungsentscheidungen. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2014.
AUGSBERG, Ino. Von einem neuerdings erhobenen empiristischen Ton in der Rechtswissenschaft. Der Staat, v. 51, n. 1, p. 117-125, 2012.
BERGER, Peter L.; LUCKMANN, Thomas. Die gesellschaftliche Konstruktion der Wirklichkeit: eine Theorie der Wissenssoziologie. Frankfurt am Main: S. Fischer, 1969.
BLUMENBERG, Hans. Wirklichkeiten, in denen wir leben: Aufsätze und eine Rede. Stuttgart: Reclam, 1996.
BODANSKY, Daniel. Legal Realism and its Discontents. Leiden Journal of International Law, v. 28, n. 2, p. 267-281, jun. 2015.
BOURDIEU, Pierre. The Force of Law: Toward a Sociology of the Juridical Field. Hastings Law Journal, v. 38, n. 5, p. 814, 1 jan. 1987.
DANZIGER, Shai; LEVAV, Jonathan; AVNAIM-PESSO, Liora. Extraneous factors in judicial decisions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, v. 108, n. 17, Social Sciences, p. 6889-6892, 26 abr. 2011.
DASTON, Lorraine. Baconian facts, academic civility and the prehistory of objectivity. Annals of Scholarship, v. 8, p. 337-363, 1991.
DASTON, Lorraine. Objectivity and the Escape from Perspective. Social Studies of Science, v. 22, n. 4, p. 597-618, 1992.
DILTHEY, Wilhelm. Die geistige Welt: Einleitung in die Philosophie des Lebens. Stuttgart / Göttingen: B.G. Teubner Verlagsgesellschaft, 1957.
ERLANGER, Howard S.; GARTH, Bryant; LARSON, Jane E.; MERTZ, Elizabeth; NOURSE, Victoria; WILKINS, David B. Is it Time for a New Legal Realism? Wisconsin Law Review, v. 2, 25 2006.
FERRARIS, Maurizio. Manifesto del nuovo realismo. Rom: Laterza, 2012.
FISH, Stanley. There’s No Such Thing As Free Speech: And It’s a Good Thing, Too. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.
FOUCAULT, Michel. Dits et Ecrits. Schriften in vier Bänden. Volume 2. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2002.
GABRIEL, Markus (Org.). Der Neue Realismus. Berlin: Suhrkamp, 2015.
GREEN, Michael. Legal Realism as Theory of Law. William & Mary Law Review, v. 46, n. 6, p. 1915, 2005.
HAMACHER, Werner. Entferntes Verstehen: Studien zu Philosophie und Literatur von Kant bis Celan. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1998.
HART, Herbert Lionel Adolphus. The Concept Of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.
HIEBAUM, Christian; KNALLER, Susanne; PICHLER, Doris. Recht und Literatur im Zwischenraum / Law and Literature In-Between: Aktuelle inter- und transdisziplinäre Zugänge / Contemporary Inter- and Transdisciplinary Approaches. Bielefeld: transcript, 2015.
HOLTERMANN, Jakob V. H.; MADSEN, Mikael Rask. European New Legal Realism and International Law: How to Make International Law Intelligible. Leiden Journal of International Law, v. 28, p. 211, 2015.
HUNEEUS, Alexandra. Human Rights between Jurisprudence and Social Science. Leiden Journal of International Law, v. 28, n. 2, p. 255-266, 2015.
JAMES, Henry. Complete Stories, 1892-1898. Nova Iorque: Library of America, 1996.
JAUSS, Hans Robert: (Org.). Nachahmung und Illusion: Kolloquium Gießen Juni 1963. Vorlagen und Verhandlungen. Munique: Fink, 1969.
JELLINEK, Georg. Allgemeine Staatslehre. Tübingen: Häring, 1914.
JOERGES, Christian; LADEUR, Karl-Heinz; VOS, Ellen (Org.). Integrating Scientific Expertise Into Regulatory Decision-making: National Tradi- tions and European Innovations. Baden-Baden: European University Institute, 1997.
KELSEN, Hans. Allgemeine Staatslehre. Tübingen: Springer, 1925.
KELSEN, Hans. Der soziologische und der juristische staatsbegriff: kritische untersuchung des verhältnisses von staat und recht. Tübingen: Aalen, 1924. (2ª Reimpressão Aalen, 1981).
KELSEN, Hans. Reine Rechtslehre: Einleitung in die rechtswissenschaftliche Problematik. Leipzig: Aalen, 1985.
KLABBERS, Jan. Counter-Disciplinarity. International Political Sociology, v. 4, n. 3, p. 308-311, 2010.
KLABBERS, Jan. The relative autonomy of international law or the forgotten politics of interdisciplinarity. Journal of international law & international relations, v. 1, n. 1-2, p. 35-48, 2005.
KOZINSKI, Alex. What I Ate for Breakfast and Other Mysteries of Judicial Decision Making. Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, v. 26, n. 4, p. 993, 1 jun. 1993.
KRÄMER, Sybille. Medium, Bote, Übertragung: Kleine Metaphysik der Medialität. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 2008.
KUHN, Thomas. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970.
LANG, Andrew. New Legal Realism, Empiricism, and Scientism: The Relative Objectivity of Law and Social Science. Leiden Journal of International Law, v. 28, n. 2, p. 231-254, 2015.
LASK, Emil. Gesammelte Schriften. Tübingen: Mohr, 1923.
LEE, Kye I. Die Struktur der juristischen Entscheidung aus konstruktivistischer Sicht. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2010.
LUHMANN, Niklas. Die Wissenschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1990.
LUHMANN, Niklas. Organisation und Entscheidung. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2000.
LUHMANN, Niklas. Recht und Automation in der öffentlichen Verwaltung: Eine verwaltungswissenschaftliche Untersuchung. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1966.
LUHMANN, Niklas. Soziologische Aufklärung 5: Konstruktivistische Perspektiven. Wiesbaden: Springer-Verlag, 2009.
MEILLASSOUX, Quentin. After Finitude: An Essay on the Necessity of Contingency. Nova Iorque: Continuum, 2009.
NASSEHI, Armin; NOLLMANN, Gerd (Orgs.). Bourdieu und Luhmann: Ein Theorienvergleich. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 2004.
NOURSE, Victoria; SHAFFER, Gregory. Varieties of New Legal Realism: Can a New World Order Prompt a New Legal Theory? Cornell Law Review, v. 95, 15 maio 2009.
PETERSEN, Niels. Braucht die Rechtswissenschaft eine empirische Wende? Der Staat, v. 49, n. 3, p. 435-456, 2010.
RHEINBERGER, Hans-Jörg. Epistemologie des Konkreten: Studien zur Geschichte der modernen Biologie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2006.
RHEINBERGER, Hans-Jörg. Iterationen. Berlim: Merve-Verlag, 2005.
ROSEN, Lawrence. Law as Culture: An Invitation. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006.
RUMBLE, Wilfrid E. American Legal Realism: Skepticism, Reform, and the Judicial Process. Nova Iorque: Cornell University Press, 1968.
SCHLEGEL, John Henry. American Legal Realism and Empirical Social Science. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2009.
SHAFFER, Gregory; GINSBURG, Tom. The Empirical Turn in International Legal Scholarship. American Journal of International Law, v. 106, n. 1, p. 1-46, 2012.
SHAFFER, Gregory. The New Legal Realist Approach to International Law. Leiden Journal of International Law, v. 28, n. 2, p. 189-210, 2015.
STÄHELI, Urs. Sinnzusammenbrüche: eine dekonstruktive Lektüre von Niklas Luhmanns Systemtheorie. Weilerswist: Velbrück Wissenschaft, 2000.
TEUBNER, Gunther (Org.). Autopoietic Law: A New Approach to Law and Society. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1988.
VESTING, Thomas. Die Medien des Rechts: Buchdruck. Weilerswist: Velbrück, 2013.
VESTING, Thomas. Die Medien des Rechts: Computernetzwerke. Weilerswist: Velbrück, 2015.
VESTING, Thomas. Die Medien des Rechts: Schrift. Weilerswist: Velbrück, 2011a.
VESTING, Thomas. Die Medien des Rechts: Sprache. Weilerswist: Velbrück, 2011b.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Law
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The published work is the entirely the responsibility of the authors, and Revista de Direito is only responsible for its evaluation, as a medium for scientific publication.
After publication, the authors cede the copyright, which becomes the property of Revista de Direito.
Revista de Direito is not responsible for any violations of Law No. 9,610/1998, the Brazilian Copyright Law.
In the identification of plagiarism and self-plagiarism, the manuscript will be rejected.
