Effect of the quality of public governance on the feeling of public confidence in government institutions: an analysis for Latin American countries
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21118/apgs.v10i4.5518Keywords:
Sentimento de Confiança. Governança Pública. América Latina.Abstract
The aim of the present study is to verify the effect of the quality of public governance on the feeling of confidence of the population in the governmental institutions of Latin American countries. The analysis comprises a period of 19 years (1996 - 2014) for a scenario of seven countries. The main results show that the better the quality of public governance, greater the public confidence in government institutions tends to be, although at a frequency of 0 to 100% the level of trust in institutions such as the armed forces, the police, judiciary, political parties, parliament and national government, does not exceed 50% for most cases. These findings generally provide support for strengthening the confidence of citizens and, in particular, public institutions in those countries. Indeed, public confidence can be improved when governments, among other government institutions, are able to provide goods and services that raise the level of social welfare of those.
Downloads
References
Bovaird, T. & Löffler, E. (2003). Evaluating the quality of public governance: indicators, models and methodologies. International Review of Administrative Sciences, v. 69, n. 3, p. 313-328.
Cheung, A. B. L. (2013). Public governance reform in Hong Kong: Rebuilding trust and governability. International Journal of Public Sector Management, v. 26, n. 5, p. 421-436.
Christensen, T. & Lagreid, P. (2005). Trust in government: The relative importance of service satisfaction, political factors, and demography. Public Performance & Management Review, v. 28, n. 4, p. 487-511.
Delhey, J. & Newton, K. (2005). Predicting cross-national levels of social trust: global pattern or Nordic exceptionalism? European Sociological Review, v. 21, n. 4, p. 311-327.
Heintzman, R. & Marson, B. (2005). People, service and trust: is there a public sector service value chain? International Review of Administrative Sciences, v. 71, n. 4, p. 549-575.
Kikuchi, M. (2008). Assessing government efforts to (Re) build trust in government: challenges and lessons learned from Japanese experiences. Research in Public Policy Analysis and Management, v. 17, p. 201-25.
Kim, S. (2010). Public trust in government in Japan and South Korea: Does the rise of critical citizens matter? Public Administration Review, v. 70, n. 5, p. 801-810.
Kim, S. (2010). Public trust in government in Japan and South Korea: Does the rise of critical citizens matter? Public Administration Review, v. 70, n. 5, p. 801-810.
Kissler, L. & Heidemann, F. G. (2006). Governança pública: novo modelo regulatório para as relações entre Estado, mercado e sociedade? Revista de Administração Pública, v. 40, n. 3, p. 479-499.
Levi, M. (1998). A state of trust. Trust and governance, v. 1, p. 77-101.
Löffler, E. (2001). Governance: Die neue Generation von Staats-und Verwaltungs-modern-isierung. Verwaltung und Management, p. 212-215.
Mimicopoulos, M., Kyj, L., Sormani, N., Bertucci, G. & Qian, H. (2007). Public governance indicators: A literature review. New York, NY: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
Mishler, W. & Rose, R. (2001). Political support for incomplete democracies: Realist vs. idealist theories and measures. International Political Science Review, v. 22, n. 4, p. 303-320.
Morris, S. D. & Klesner, J. L. (2010). Corruption and trust: Theoretical considerations and evidence from Mexico. Comparative Political Studies, v. 43, n. 10, p. 1258-1285.
Nye, J. S., Zelikow, P.& King, D. C. (1997). Why people don't trust government. Harvard University Press.
Park, H. & Blenkinsopp, J. (2011). The roles of transparency and trust in the relationship between corruption and citizen satisfaction. International Review of Administrative Sciences, v. 77, n. 2, p. 254-274.
Porumbescu, G. A. (2015). Does transparency improve citizens’ perceptions of government performance? Evidence from Seoul, South Korea. Administration & Society.
Porumbescu, G. A. & Park, Y. (2014). Examining the distinctiveness of antecedents to trust in government. African and Asian Studies, v. 13, n. 3, p. 315-337.
Rennó, L. R. (2001). Confiança interpessoal e comportamento político: micro fundamentos da teoria do capital social na América Latina. Revista Opinião Pública, v. 7, n. 1, p. 33-59.
Rothstein, B. & Teorell, J. (2008). What is quality of government? A theory of impartial government institutions. Governance, v. 21, n. 2, p. 165-190.
Rothstein, B. & Uslaner, E. M. (2005). All for all: Equality, corruption, and social trust. World politics, v. 58, n. 01, p. 41-72.
Uslaner, E. M. (2003). Trust, democracy and governance: Can government policies influence generalized trust? In: Generating social capital. Palgrave Macmillan US, p. 171-190.
Van de Walle, S., Van Roosbroek, S. & Bouckaert, G. (2008). Trust in the public sector: is there any evidence for a long-term decline? International Review of Administrative Sciences, v. 74, n. 1, p. 47-64.
Van Ryzin, G. G. (2005). Expectations, performance, and citizen satisfaction with urban services. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, v. 23, n. 3, p. 433-448.
Welch, E. W., Hinnant, C. C. & Moon, M. J. (2005). Linking citizen satisfaction with e-government and trust in government. Journal of public administration research and theory, v. 15, n. 3, p. 371-391.
WGI - The Worldwide Governance Indicators. (2015). Disponível em: < http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/index.aspx#home>. Acesso em: 03 jun. 2016.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in the Journal of Public Administration and Management Social (APGS) must agree to the following terms:
• Authors retain copyright and give the journal the rightof first publication with the work simultaneously licensed underthe Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting sharingwork with the recognition of the work of authorship and publicationstarting in this journal.
• Authors have authorization to assume additional contractsseparately for non-exclusive distribution of the work releasepublished in this journal (eg. publish in institutional repositories oras a book), with an acknowledgment of its publicationstarting this journal.
• Authors are permitted and encouraged to post theirwork online (eg, in institutional repositories or on their websitepersonnel) at any point before or during the submission process, asit can generate criticism and helpful suggestions, as well asincrease the impact and citation of published work.
• Authors reserve the right of the editors of this journal to make in theoriginal works, alterations of normative order, orthographic andgrammatical, aiming at complying with its editorial policy and keep thedefault cult of language, respecting, however, the authors' style.
• Authors assume exclusive responsibility for their opinionsgiven in the articles published in this journal.