DESCRIPTION OF PROCESS IN AQUEOUS SOLUTIONS: DIFFERENCES BETWEEN XIX AND XX CENTURIES CONCEPTIONS

Authors

  • André Fernando Oliveira Universidade Federal de Viçosa
  • Renata Lopes Pereira Universidade Federal de Viçosa
  • Marcos Flores Jr Arclin Surfaces
  • Antônio Augusto Neves Universidade Federal de Viçosa
  • Maria Eliana Lopes Ribeiro Queiroz Universidade Federal de Viçosa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18540/jcecvl5iss1pp0020-0025

Keywords:

Aqueous Solution, Chemical Equibria, Misconceptions / Discrepant Events, Chemical Equation

Abstract

The development of studies of Chemical solutions occurred with two distinct concepts, the XIX century concept, and the XX century concept. XIX century concept was created before the Arrhenius’ electrolytic theory and it did not consider the real chemical species in solution. The differences between these concepts can seem subtle at a glance, but some examples are shown to clarify them, as well as the problems with use the XIX century concept. The examples involve differences in chemical equations, Henderson-Hasselbach Equation, Arrhenius’ Ionization degree, Acid-base and solubility equilibria.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

André Fernando Oliveira, Universidade Federal de Viçosa

Departamento de Química 

Áreas de atuação:

Química Analítica

Estatística Aplicada à Química /Quimiometria

Equilíbrio Químico em Solução

 

Renata Lopes Pereira, Universidade Federal de Viçosa

Departamento de Química

Química Analítica

Química Ambiental

Marcos Flores Jr, Arclin Surfaces

P&D

Fisico-química de Superfícies

Antônio Augusto Neves, Universidade Federal de Viçosa

Departamento de Química

 

Química Analítica

Cromatografia

Preparo de Amostra

Maria Eliana Lopes Ribeiro Queiroz, Universidade Federal de Viçosa

Departamento de Química

Química Analítica

Cromatografia

Preparo de Amostras

References

1. BAUER, H. História de La Química,Ed Labor: Barcelona, 1933. (In Spanish)
2. BROWN, T. E.; LEMAY, H. E. H.; BURSTEN, B. E.; WOODWARD, P.;MURPHY, C. Chemistry The Central Science, 12th ed.; Prentice Hall: NY, 2011.
3. KOTZ, J.C.; TREIC HEL, P.M.;TOWNSEND, J.R., Chemistry & Chemical Reactivity, 8th ed., Cengage Learning: Belmont, 2012.
4. SZABADRARY, F. C., History of Analytical Chemistry Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1996; PARTINGTON, J.R., History of chemistry, St Martin Press: N. York, 1961.
5. MACINNES, D. A., The Principles of Electrochemistry, Reinhold Publishing Co.: N.Y, 1939.
6. HALL, F. N., J.Chem.Ed., 1940, 124.
7. FRANKLIN, E.C.; J.Am.Chem.Soc.46,1924, 2437; GERMANN, A.F.O Science 1921, 582.; GERMANN, A.F.O J. Am.Chem.Soc. 1925, 47, 2461.; FRANKLIN E.C.; J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1924, 46, 2137.
8. MCCUTCHEON, T.P; SELTZ, H; WARNER, J.C. General Chemistry, 3rd ed.;Van Nostrand : NYork, 1939.
9. DEAN, D.A., Lange’s Handbook, 15th ed., CRC: Boca Raton, 1999.
10. MARX, D.; TUCKERMAN, M.E.; PARRINELLO, J.H.M, Nature, 397, 601-604.
11. VENER, M.V.; LIBROVICH, N.B., Journal International Reviews in Physical Chemistry Volume 28, 2009 (3),407-434
12. OLIVEIRA, A. F., Equilíbrio Químico em Solução Aquosa (Chemical Equilibrium in Aqueous Solution) Editora Átomo: Campinas, 2009. (in portuguese)
13. HARRIS, D. C. Quantitative Chemical Analysis, 8th edition, W.H.Freeman &Co: N.York, 2010.
14. PO, H. N., J. Chem.Ed., 2001, (78) 1499-1503; Levie, R.Chem.Educator, 2002, (7) 132-135.
15. KOLTHOFF, I.M., Acid-Base Indicators, (1937) MacMillan, N.York
16. VOGEL, A. I. SVEHLA,G., Vogel’s Macro and semimicro qualitative inorganic analysis, 5th ed. Longman Group: London. 605 pp.
17. PAIK, S-H, J. Chem. Educ., 2015, 92 (9), 1484–1489

Downloads

Published

2019-03-08

How to Cite

Oliveira, A. F., Pereira, R. L., Flores Jr, M., Neves, A. A., & Queiroz, M. E. L. R. (2019). DESCRIPTION OF PROCESS IN AQUEOUS SOLUTIONS: DIFFERENCES BETWEEN XIX AND XX CENTURIES CONCEPTIONS. The Journal of Engineering and Exact Sciences, 5(1), 0020–0025. https://doi.org/10.18540/jcecvl5iss1pp0020-0025

Issue

Section

Engineering Education and Science Education