Topology Optimization and Experimental Validation of a Baja Competition Brake Pedal Design

Artur Fernando de Vito Junior; Gustavo Okada; Ygor Navarro; Raphael Ragozzino; Sandro Vatanabe; André Mendes

doi:10.18540/jcecvl11iss1pp21584

Autores/as

Artur Fernando de Vito Junior Centro Universitario FEI, Brazil https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2451-2740
Gustavo Okada Centro Universitário FEI
Ygor Navarro Centro Universitário FEI, Brazil
Raphael Ragozzino Centro Universitário FEI, Brazil
Sandro Vatanabe Centro Universitário FEI, Brazil https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7400-290X
André Mendes Centro Universitário FEI, Brazil https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9080-7390

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18540/jcecvl11iss1pp21584

Palabras clave:

Topology Optimization, Experimental Validation, BAJA

Resumen

The automotive industry continually seeks innovative methods to reduce vehicle weight, enhance efficiency, and maintain structural integrity. This study presents a detailed framework that combines topology optimization (TO) and experimental validation, applied specifically to the design of a brake pedal for a Baja competition vehicle. The research involves a multi-step process, starting with finite element modeling, followed by TO using ANSYS Workbench to optimize the pedal's material distribution for weight reduction. Post-processing in Siemens NX is then performed to incorporate manufacturing constraints, ensuring the design is suitable for water jet cutting. The optimized brake pedal, constructed from 7075-T6 aluminum, weighs 42.6 g and demonstrates stress levels well below the yield strength of the material. Dimensions were determined based on the available space within the vehicle to ensure that the brake pedal would not interfere with any vehicle structure and would not impede the driver during operation. These considerations ensured that the pedal’s design maximized comfort and safety for the driver. Experimental validation is conducted through force and strain measurements, resulting in a 3.5% discrepancy between simulated and experimental stress values. Over 50 hours of track testing, including extensive on-road competition use, confirms the robustness and practical viability of the optimized design. This work underscores the potential of TO as a powerful tool for lightweight component design, demonstrating its integration with real-world testing and the ability to enhance the manufacturability of critical automotive components. The framework presented here not only validates the design process for brake pedals but also offers a versatile approach applicable to other vehicle components, contributing to the broader goal of optimizing automotive performance through lightweight designs.

Descargas

Citas

Bendsøe, M. P., & Kikuchi, N. (1988). Generating optimal topologies in structural design using a homogenization method. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 71(2), 197–224. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(88)90086-2

Bendsoe, M. P., & Sigmund, O. (2004). Topology Optimization: Theory, Methods and Applications. Springer.

de Vito, A. F., Vicente, W. M., & Xie, Y. M. (2023). Topology optimization applied to the core of structural engineered wood product. Structures, 48, 1567–1575. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2023.01.036

Do?an, O., Kalay, O., Kartal, E., & Karpat, F. (2020). Optimum design of brake pedal for trucks using structural optimization and design of experiment techniques. International Journal of Automotive Science And Technology, 4(4), 272–280.

Huang, X., & Xie, Y. M. (2007). Convergent and mesh-independent solutions for the bi-directional evolutionary structural optimization method. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 43(14), 1039–1049. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2007.06.006

Huang, X., Zuo, Z. H., & Xie, Y. M. (2010). Evolutionary topological optimization of vibrating continuum structures for natural frequencies. Computers and Structures, 88(5–6), 357–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2009.11.011

Hunar, M., Jancar, L., Krzikalla, D., Kaprinay, D., & Srnicek, D. (2020). Comprehensive View on Racing Car Upright Design and Manufacturing. Symmetry, 12(6).

Kulangara, A. J., Rao, C. S. P., & Cherian, J. (2021). Topology optimization of lattice structure on a brake pedal. Materials Today: Proceedings, 47, 5334–5337. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.06.059

Limpert, R. (2011). Brake design and safety. SAE international.

Liu, D., Chiu, L. N. S., Davies, C., & Yan, W. (2020). A post-processing method to remove stress singularity and minimize local stress concentration for topology optimized designs. Advances in Engineering Software, 145, 102815. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2020.102815

Martínez-Frutos, J., Martínez-Castejón, P. J., & Herrero-Pérez, D. (2017). Efficient topology optimization using GPU computing with multilevel granularity. Advances in Engineering Software, 106, 47–62. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2017.01.009

Mikulikova, A., Mesicek, J., Karger, J., Hajnys, J., Ma, Q.-P., Sliva, A., Smiraus, J., Srnicek, D., Cienciala, S., & Pagac, M. (2023). Topology Optimization of the Clutch Lever Manufactured by Additive Manufacturing. Materials, 16(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16093510

Picelli Renato and Sivapuram, R. and X. Y. M. (2021). A 101-line MATLAB code for topology optimization using binary variables and integer programming. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 63(2), 935–954. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-020-02719-9

Querin O. M. and Steven, G. P. and X. Y. M. (1998). Evolutionary structural optimisation (ESO) using a bidirectional algorithm. Engineering Computations, 15(8), 1031–1048. https://doi.org/10.1108/02644409810244129

Romero, J., & Queipo, N. (2017). Reliability-based and deterministic design optimization of a FSAE brake pedal: a risk allocation analysis. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 56, 681–695.

Sethian, J. A., & Wiegmann, A. (2000). Structural Boundary Design via Level Set and Immersed Interface Methods. Journal of Computational Physics, 163(2), 489–528. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.2000.6581

Silva, K. E. S., Sivapuram, R., Ranjbarzadeh, S., Gioria, R. dos S., Silva, E. C. N., & Picelli, R. (2022). Topology optimization of stationary fluid–structure interaction problems including large displacements via the TOBS-GT method. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 65(11), 337.

Sivapuram, R., & Picelli, R. (2018). Topology optimization of binary structures using Integer Linear Programming. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 139, 49–61. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2017.10.006

Subedi, S. C., Verma, C. S., & Suresh, K. (2020). A Review of Methods for the Geometric Post-Processing of Topology Optimized Models. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 20(6), 60801. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4047429

Vatanabe, S. L., Lippi, T. N., de Lima, C. R., Paulino, G. H., & Silva, E. C. N. (2016). Topology optimization with manufacturing constraints: A unified projection-based approach. Advances in Engineering Software, 100, 97–112. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2016.07.002

Vicente, W. M., Zuo, Z. H., Pavanello, R., Calixto, T. K. L., Picelli, R., & Xie, Y. M. (2016). Concurrent topology optimization for minimizing frequency responses of two-level hierarchical structures. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 301, 116–136. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2015.12.012

Xie, Y. M., & Steven, G. P. (1993). A simple evolutionary procedure for structural optimization. Computers & Structures, 49(5), 885–896. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(93)90035-C

Zhou, M., & Rozvany, G. I. N. (1991). The COC algorithm, Part II: Topological, geometrical and generalized shape optimization. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 89(1–3), 309–336.